mistrial
LOS ANGELES, Sept. 26 ― The murder trial of the music producer Phil Spector ended on Wednesday in a mistrial after the jury, leaning heavily to convict him, could not reach a unanimous verdict.
Skip to next paragraph
Damian Dovarganes/Associated Press
Phil Spector and his wife, Rachelle, leave the Los Angeles courtroom where his trail for murder had ended in a mistrial.
The Los Angeles County district attorney's office said it planned to retry the case.
Mr. Spector, 67, charged with second-degree murder in the killing of Lana Clarkson in his home in 2003, stared blankly forward as Judge Larry Paul Fidler of Superior Court ended the proceedings after the jury foreman had reported a 10-2 deadlock.
The impasse occurred after an earlier deadlock of 7-5 that jurors later said also tilted toward conviction. That impasse led the judge to take the unusual step of sending the jurors back to deliberate with new instructions, angering the defense.
Three jurors, speaking to reporters afterward, said the two holdouts gave credence to a defense assertion that the death of Ms. Clarkson, 40, a struggling actress, might have been a suicide rather than a murder.
The three jurors said the jury had also been troubled by the lack of large amounts of blood on Mr. Spector and the poor English of a witness, Mr. Spector's driver, who said he had heard Mr. Spector say, "I think I killed somebody."
Judge Fidler retained orders for silence, preventing lawyers and others in the case from speaking publicly. He set a hearing for Oct. 3.
Mr. Spector, the mastermind behind hits like "Da Doo Ron Ron" and "Be My Baby," escorted by his wife, lawyers and bodyguards, left through an adjacent courtroom without saying a word, free on bail.
He joins Michael Jackson, O. J. Simpson and Robert Blake among celebrities whom Southern California prosecutors have failed to convict in high-profile criminal cases.
Alan Jackson, a lead prosecutor in the case, sat glumly in a courthouse hallway as a spokeswoman for the district attorney's office reiterated the judge's order barring him from speaking.
"We're disappointed the jury was unable to reach a verdict in this case, and we will immediately begin preparations for a retrial," the spokeswoman, Sandi Gibbons, said later at a news conference. She declined to comment further.
Mr. Spector was accused of killing Ms. Clarkson, whom he had met at a nightclub hours before she was found dead from a gunshot wound to her mouth in the foyer of Mr. Spector's house in a Los Angeles suburb.
Prosecutors said Mr. Spector shot Ms. Clarkson in an alcohol-fueled rage after she had resisted his advances. They presented testimony from five other women who described similar threats by Mr. Spector.
The prosectors failed to present forensic evidence that placed the gun in Mr. Spector's hand and relied instead on a spray of blood on his clothes.
The defense, portraying Ms. Clarkson as despondent over her career and finances, presented experts and scientific evidence to buttress their assertion that she had shot herself, intentionally or not. They said the pattern of blood indicated that Mr. Spector was too far away to have pulled the trigger.
One juror who declined to give his name said he voted to convict, because given "the totality of the evidence, what was the most plausible reason she could have died."
Another juror suggested that a psychological profile of Ms. Clarkson by prosecutors might have indicated whether she had been suicidal.
The jury foreman said some jurors were troubled with the statement from Mr. Spector's driver, Adriano De Souza, a Brazilian immigrant, who admitted having problems with English.
The case was remarkable for the virtual second chance the judge gave prosecutors after the jury reported a deadlock on Sept. 10, having deliberated for seven days.
Judge Fidler removed an instruction that they considered confusing, ruling that it misstated the law on second-degree murder, and read them new instructions that, to the fury of the defense, included a few situations in which Mr. Spector could have killed Ms. Clarkson.
Jean Rosenbluth, a former federal prosecutor and University of Southern California law professor who monitored the case, said there was little more prosecutors could have done.
Professor Rosenbluth said she doubted that jurors were impressed by Mr. Spector's celebrity, as he was a behind-the-scenes figure and his fame had faded from the 1960s and early '70s.
She suggested that the defense had succeeded in creating doubt about the prosecution case with expert witnesses and said prosecutors had erred in not pushing hard for the jury to consider a lesser charge of involuntary manslaughter.
"A lot people may say this is just like the other cases, but he was not acquitted," Professor Rosenbluth said. "He was almost convicted. I think this says much more about money than celebrity and the resources money can buy when you are on trial."
It was the first televised Los Angeles celebrity trial since the Simpson case in 1995, but it did not attract the following or frenzied coverage of that or other cases.
Mr. Spector has not been behind a hit in decades. He is best known in music circles for his Wall of Sound technique, marrying lush orchestral arrangements to guitars and other staples of pop music. A member of the Rock A mistrial has been declared in the trial of music producer Phil Spector for murder after the jury failed to reach a verdict.
The judge in Los Angeles discharged the jury and has set a hearing for 3 October to decide how the case will now proceed.
Prosecutors have said they will be seeking a new trial.
AdvertisementSpector had faced between 15 years and life imprisonment if found guilty of murdering actress Lana Clarkson at his California home in 2003
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home